Legal Opinion

Matlock v. Industrial Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 25, 2001No. 1-99-3877 WC, 1-99-3898 WCPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rarick

Claimant, Beverly Matlock, sought benefits pursuant to the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) (820 ILCS 305/1 et seq. (West 1996)) for injuries sustained while in the employ of American Airlines, employer. The arbitrator awarded claimant temporary total disability benefits and medical expenses plus penalties and attorney fees. On review, a majority of the Industrial Commission (Commission) affirmed the finding of compensability but modified the amount of temporary total disability benefits and reversed the award of penalties and attorney fees. The concurring commissioner would have also affirmed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McMahan v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Avon Products, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Board of Education of City of Chicago v. Industrial Com.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Chicago Park District v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  5. Complete Vending Services, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Brunell v. Wildwood Crest Police DepartmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  2. Mechanical Devices v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  3. USF Holland, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  4. Anders v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  5. Lenny Szarek, Inc. v. Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API