Legal Opinion

Chicago Park District v. Industrial Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 13, 1994No. 1-93-2076WCPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Slater

Claimant Eugene Dechter filed an application for adjustment of claim pursuant to the Workers’ Compensation Act (the Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 48, par. 138.1 et seq.) alleging that he was injured as a result of an altercation. The arbitrator found that claimant was permanently and totally disabled as a result of an accident which arose out of and in the course of his employment. On review, the Industrial Commission (the Commission) affirmed the arbitrator’s decision. The circuit court confirmed the Commission and the employer, Chicago Park District, appeals.

Claimant began working for the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. E. R. Moore Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Pathfinder Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. A.M.T.C. of Illinois, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Dexheimer v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  5. Marshall Field & Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Marshall v. Metropolitan Water Reclamation District Retirement FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  2. Matlock v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  3. Palos Electric Co. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  4. Pisano v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Comm'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
  5. Professional Transp. v. Workers'comp'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API