Legal Opinion

Mechanical Devices v. Industrial Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 29, 2003No. 4-02-0497 WC, 4-02-0544 WCPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Callum

Claimant, Michael Johnson, filed an application for adjustment of claim under the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) (820 ILCS 305/1 et seq. (West 2000)) for injuries to his shoulder and back. The arbitrator found that claimant had sustained accidental injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment by Mechanical Devices (employer). The arbitrator awarded claimant medical expenses and temporary total disability (TTD) benefits for 22 weeks. He denied prospective medical benefits and penalties. The Industrial Commission (Commission) reversed the arbitrator in part and found that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McMahan v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Thomas v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Zenith Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Pietrzak v. INDUSTRIAL COMM'N OF ILLINOISAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Westin Hotel v. INDUS. COM'N OF ILLINOISAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  2. Land & Lakes Co. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  3. Jacobo v. WORKERS'COMPENSATION COM'NAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  4. Armour Swift-Eckrich v. INDUSTRIAL COM'NAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  5. Residential Carpentry, Inc. v. Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API