Legal Opinion
Duratron Corp. v. Republic Stuyvesant Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 23, 1967PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
95 N.J. Super. 527 (1967)
231 A.2d 854
DURATRON CORPORATION, A NEW YORK CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
REPUBLIC STUYVESANT CORPORATION, ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND HAROLD JACOBS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued June 12, 1967.
Decided June 23, 1967.
Before Judges CONFORD, FOLEY and LEONARD.
Mr. S.M. Chris Franzblau argued the cause for appellant, Harold Jacobs (Messrs. Beckerman & Franzblau, attorneys).
Mr. Irwin I. Kimmelman argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Max L. Rosenstein, attorney).
The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, S.J.A.D.
D…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Murphy v. McCloudDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Giltner v. StarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- Mills v. Atlantic City Dept. of Vital StatisticsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Seidel v. GREENBERGNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
- Amerada Hess Corp. v. QuinnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.