Legal Opinion
Bell v. Texas Workers Compensation Commission
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided March 20, 2003No. 03-02-00510-CVPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BEA ANN SMITH, Justice.
This is an interlocutory appeal from a denial of a temporary injunction. 1 Some eighty-five percent of Robert S. Bell, M.D.’s orthopedic surgery practice involves workers compensation patients. Dr. Bell sued the Texas Workers Compensation Commission (“Commission”) because it removed him from its list of approved doctors when his license to practice medicine was revoked as a result of a felony conviction. Removal from the list means Dr. Bell cannot treat patients covered by workers compensation insurance. Dr. Bell and another similarly situated physician 2 brought…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Davis v. HueyTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Gilbert v. HomarSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Mabrey v. SandStream, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Lee v. Texas Workers' Compensation Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
- Hartford Casualty Insurance Co. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
- Hyde v. RayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Charles Glen Hyde, Hyde-Way, Inc. and Aviation Utilities Services, Inc. v. Jimmy Ray and Trent Cragin, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.