Hartford Casualty Insurance Co. v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BEA ANN SMITH, Justice.
In this case, we construe finance code section 153.402(c) 1 to determine whether the phrase “may collect from the proceeds of a bond” allows the State 2 to collect from a surety an administrative penalty assessed against the surety’s principal without first providing the surety with notice and opportunity for a hearing. Appellant, Hartford Casualty Insurance Company (Hartford), contends that since the statutory grant of authority regarding administrative penalties found in finance code section 153.402(c) is discretionary, its constitutional right to procedural…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- FM Properties Operating Co. v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jeramie Eitel, D/B/A Jeraco Investments and as Agent for Cliff's Star Construction, LLC Jenson Gainer And Otis Bakke v. John Horobec, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014
- Lawrence Higgins v. Woodburn Sears & Watkins, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2005
- Octavio Castaneda, Individually and D/B/A Castaneda Bail Bonds, Surety v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010
- Scott Phelan v. Texas Tech University, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008
- Scott Phelan v. Texas Tech University, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.