Scharf v. Crosby
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment and order unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and defendant Crosby’s motion to dismiss complaint granted. Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action against codefendants Lonnie Crosby and Ernie Shaffer alleging that defendants jointly and severally trespassed upon plaintiffs’ land, and cut down and removed timber. The complaint seeks treble damages pursuant to RPAPL 861.
Shaffer defaulted in the action and the matter proceeded to trial against Crosby. The facts are not in significant dispute. Lands owned by plaintiffs and Crosby are contiguous and the boundary lines…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Steinbeck v. GerosaNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Steinbeck v. GerosaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- M.I.F. Securities Co. v. R. C. Stamm & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- M.I.F. Securities Co. v. R.C. Stamm & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Missan v. SchoenfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Four Star Capital Corp. v. Nynex Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- De Vito v. PokoikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Smith v. ReddMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
- Shaw v. Delta Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1992
- Bruno v. Dynamic Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.