Legal Opinion

M.I.F. Securities Co. v. R.C. Stamm & Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 29, 1983PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Joseph P. Sullivan at the Appellate Division (94 AD2d 211) except so much thereof as holds that the individual members of Stamm partnership may not demand arbitration between MIF and Stamm partnership, an issue which we deem it unnecessary to reach or consider.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. M.I.F. Securities Co. v. R. C. Stamm & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Kennelly v. Mobius Realty Holdings LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Kyle v. FordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Alleva v. DairyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Intellivision v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  5. Baker v. KohlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API