Legal Opinion
Grand Canyon Trust v. Tucson Electric Power Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 8, 2004No. 03-15584PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
1. On Slip Op. 12691, in between the carryover paragraph (which ends with “relatively lax pollution rules.”) and the first full paragraph (which begins with “Tucson Electric was well aware ... ”), the following paragraph is inserted:
Specifically, the 1978 Regulations provided:
Approval to construct shall become invalid if construction is not commenced within 18 months after the receipt of such approval, if construction is discontinued for a period of 18 months or more, or if construction is not completed within a reasonable time. The Administrator may extend the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Danjaq LLC v. Sony Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. BeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- McKnight v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Sierra Club v. Franklin County Power of Illinois, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Romoland School District v. Inland Empire Energy Center, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Timeless Investments, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Eat Right Foods Ltd. v. Whole Foods Mkt. Servs., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Magic Kitchen LLC v. Good Things International, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.