Guardianship of Schmidt v. Barkholtz
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
Three issues are presented on this appeal:
1. Did the trial court abuse its discretion in denying the appellants’ motion for continuance ?
2. Did the trial court erroneously accord substantial weight to the natural father’s nomination of a guardian in reaching a decision?
3. Was the trial court’s choice of guardians an abuse of discretion as contrary to the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence concerning the best interests of the children?
Denial of continuance.
It is a long-established principle in Wisconsin that the grant or refusal of a continuance is a matter within the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Loomans v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Littmann v. LittmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Page v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Adoption of RandolphWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Estate of Hatten v. First Wisconsin Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In INTEREST OF DH v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. GleasonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Robertson-Ryan & Associates, Inc. v. PohlhammerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- W.W.W. v. M.C.S.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- In Matter of Adoption of RPRCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.