Estate of Hatten v. First Wisconsin Trust Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
The occasions of presenting the question now raised are comparatively few. As a general rule motions for continuance pass off upon affidavits when circumstances are shown which prevent a party from completing his preparation for trial or that a witness has failed to appear. The party swears he cannot safely go fi> trial because of such good reason and a postponement is granted, the presentation of the reasons overcoming the presumption that the application is made for the mere purpose of delay.
It is true that in every case where a discretionary order in effect denies a party his day in court,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miller v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Druska v. Western Wisconsin Telephone Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- State ex rel. Hallam v. LallyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- McCall v. BiltyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- Schamper v. UllrichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Allen v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Robertson-Ryan & Associates, Inc. v. PohlhammerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Page v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Guardianship of Schmidt v. BarkholtzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Cukrowski v. Mt. Sinai Hospital, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.