Legal Opinion

Estate of Hatten v. First Wisconsin Trust Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1939PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The occasions of presenting the question now raised are comparatively few. As a general rule motions for continuance pass off upon affidavits when circumstances are shown which prevent a party from completing his preparation for trial or that a witness has failed to appear. The party swears he cannot safely go fi> trial because of such good reason and a postponement is granted, the presentation of the reasons overcoming the presumption that the application is made for the mere purpose of delay.

It is true that in every case where a discretionary order in effect denies a party his day in court,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Druska v. Western Wisconsin Telephone Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  3. State ex rel. Hallam v. LallyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  4. McCall v. BiltyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Schamper v. UllrichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Allen v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Robertson-Ryan & Associates, Inc. v. PohlhammerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Page v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Guardianship of Schmidt v. BarkholtzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Cukrowski v. Mt. Sinai Hospital, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API