Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Dressler v. Rigg

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 18, 1958No. 37,451PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, Justice.

Upon relator’s appeal from an order of the district court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, respondent moves for an order dismissing the petition upon the grounds that such petition is wholly lacking in merit and alleges no facts upon which a writ of habeas corpus may be based. The main legal issue involved is whether in a criminal proceeding, when the accused is convicted of a felony and sentenced to imprisonment, the law requires that the judgment of conviction and sentence must be signed by the presiding judge. The other legal issue raised by relator is his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Baker v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  2. Willoughby v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. State ex rel. Hansen v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. State v. RudinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  5. Hoskins v. BaxterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Munnell v. RiggSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  2. State Ex Rel. Stout v. RiggSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API