State ex rel. Hansen v. Utecht
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
There is before us an appeal from the order denying petitioner a writ of habeas corpus. This brings the case here de novo, but instead of appointing a referee to take testimony upon the petition, we consider the question as to whether the petition on its face presents a case for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus. We take the view that it does not present such a case, but wholly fails to do so, and we cannot do better than to quote from the memorandum attached to Judge Alfred P. Stolberg’s order denying the issuance of a writ.
“The petition is defective for failure to comply with M. S. A.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. FindlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- State ex rel. Petcoff v. ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- State ex rel. Carmody v. ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- State ex rel. McDonald v. RileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- State ex rel. Sherin v. GossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Adams v. RiggSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Shaw v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Breeding v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- State Ex Rel. Welper v. RiggSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- State v. LinehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.