Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hansen v. Utecht

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 6, 1950No. 35,157PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

There is before us an appeal from the order denying petitioner a writ of habeas corpus. This brings the case here de novo, but instead of appointing a referee to take testimony upon the petition, we consider the question as to whether the petition on its face presents a case for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus. We take the view that it does not present such a case, but wholly fails to do so, and we cannot do better than to quote from the memorandum attached to Judge Alfred P. Stolberg’s order denying the issuance of a writ.

“The petition is defective for failure to comply with M. S. A.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. FindlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. State ex rel. Petcoff v. ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  3. State ex rel. Carmody v. ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. State ex rel. McDonald v. RileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  5. State ex rel. Sherin v. GossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Adams v. RiggSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Shaw v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Breeding v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. State Ex Rel. Welper v. RiggSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. State v. LinehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API