Legal Opinion

Graham v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided March 13, 1989No. 07-88-0332-CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Chief Justice.

Appellant Clinton Keith Graham was charged by information with selling obscene material, an offense denounced by Section 43.23(c)(1), Texas Penal Code Annotated (Vernon 1989). After his motion to quash the “complaint” was denied, appellant entered his non-negotiated plea of nolo contendere. The court accepted the plea, found appellant guilty, and assessed his punishment at a fine of $1,000 and confinement in the county jail for twenty days, to be served on consecutive week-ends.

Appealing without a statement of facts and with two “grounds,” now points, of error,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Maryland v. MacOnSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Fort Wayne Books, Inc. v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Ex Parte MartinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Rovinsky v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Childress v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API