Childress v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
DUGGAN, Justice.
This is an appeal from a conviction for selling obscene material. The defendant pleaded nolo contendere pursuant to a plea bargain, and the court assessed the recommended punishment of 3 days in jail and a fine of $400.
Appellant raises two points of error. First, he complains that the court erred in denying his pre-trial motion to quash the indictment because the Texas Obscenity Statute, Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 43.21 (Vernon 1988), is unconstitutionally vague, and therefore void. Second, he complains that the trial court erred in denying his motion to quash because there was no…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Pope v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ex Parte GranvielCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Andrews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Morris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Handl v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Commonwealth v. McCoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Graham v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1989
- Ibarra v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Mazuera v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989