Legal Opinion

Childress v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided June 2, 1988No. 01-87-01090-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUGGAN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a conviction for selling obscene material. The defendant pleaded nolo contendere pursuant to a plea bargain, and the court assessed the recommended punishment of 3 days in jail and a fine of $400.

Appellant raises two points of error. First, he complains that the court erred in denying his pre-trial motion to quash the indictment because the Texas Obscenity Statute, Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 43.21 (Vernon 1988), is unconstitutionally vague, and therefore void. Second, he complains that the trial court erred in denying his motion to quash because there was no…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Pope v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Ex Parte GranvielCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Andrews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  5. Morris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Handl v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. Commonwealth v. McCoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Graham v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1989
  4. Ibarra v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Mazuera v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API