Legal Opinion

Eiseman-Ludmar Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 9, 1975No. Court No. 73-6-01552PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Boe, Chief Judge:

The merchandise concerning which the within cause of action relates is described on the commercial and special customs invoices as “fur felts,” imported from Japan and entered at the port of New York on November 4, 1971, January 17, 1972 and November 1, 1972. Upon liquidation by customs officials the articles were classified by similitude under item 798.00, TSUS, at the rate of 12% or 10% ad valorem, derived, in turn, from item 124.60, TSUS, as modified by T.D. 68-9, providing:

Schedule 7, Part-14, TSUS

Any article, not provided for elsewhere in these schedules:

Which is similar…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The United States v. New York Merchandise Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  2. Ayres, Bridges & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  3. Bloomingdale Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Eiseman-Ludmar Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API