Legal Opinion
Hinds v. Paul's Auto Werkstatt, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 1, 1991No. CV88-0733; CA A64489PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Plaintiff appeals a summary judgment in favor of defendant on her claim for violation of Oregon’s Unlawful Trade Practices Act (UTPA). ORS 646.605 to ORS 646.652. We reverse.
In 1987, plaintiff purchased a used 1986 Mazda from defendant. Defendant knew, but did not tell plaintiff, that the car had been in an accident and had been repaired. It did, however, comply with the Federal Trade Commission’s Used Motor Vehicle Trade Regulation Rule by using a Buyer’s Guide form. 1 16 CFR § 455. When plaintiff learned about the accident, she brought this action, alleging that defendant had failed to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Wheeler v. GreenOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Redden v. Discount Fabrics, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Denson v. Ron Tonkin Gran Turismo, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Oregon Laborers-Employers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1998
- Parrott v. Carr Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- CollegeNet, Inc. v. Embark. Com, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2001
- State ex rel. Frohnmayer v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Adkins v. OnPoint Community Credit UnionDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.