State ex rel. Frohnmayer v. Freeman
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.
Defendants, who are chiropractic practitioners, appeal from the judgments assessing civil penalties and attorney fees against them and granting the plaintiff state injunc-tive relief in this action under the Unlawful Trade Practices Act (UTPA). ORS 646.605 etseq. Plaintiff cross-appeals from the trial court’s denial of certain investigative costs. We reverse on the appeal and affirm on the cross-appeal.
The operative allegations of plaintiff’s second amended complaint are:
“4.
“Defendants provide chiropractic care to patients. As part of chiropractic care, defendants regularly use a device…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Falk v. AmsberryOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Denson v. Ron Tonkin Gran Turismo, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Hendgen v. Forest Grove Community HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Investigators, Inc. v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Hinds v. Paul's Auto Werkstatt, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
3Cited by1 opinion
- State ex rel. Kulongoski v. CunningCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996