Legal Opinion
CollegeNet, Inc. v. Embark. Com, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided April 4, 2001No. CIV.00-981-STPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROBERT E. JONES, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart filed Findings and Recommendation on December 15, 2000, in the above entitled case. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R.Civ.P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge’s Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate judge’s report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920, 102…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Parks School of Business, Inc., Dba Parks College, a New Mexico Corporation v. Fife Symington Roy A. Nicholson Sally HeinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Pharmaceutical Industry Average Wholesale Price LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Benson Tower Condominium Owners Ass'n v. Victaulic Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2014
- Gordon v. RosenblumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Providence Health & Services-Oregon v. MancusoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- Collegenet, Inc. v. Xap Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.