Legal Opinion

Malan v. Lewis

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1984No. 17606Published

1Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

STEWART, Justice:

The defendants, James C. and Brett Lewis, petitioned for a rehearing, contending that our holding in the main opinion that the Utah Guest Statute is unconstitutional should be applied prospectively only. In particular, they argue that the ruling *676should not apply to them because the plaintiffs cause of action arose before Critch-ley v. Vance, Utah, 575 P.2d 187 (1978), was decided, which sustained the constitutionality of the Guest Statute.

The general rule from time immemorial is that the ruling of a court is deemed to state the true nature of the law…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Vaughn v. MurraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  3. Board of Education of the Granite School District v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Cannon v. OviattUtah Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Rio Algom Corp. v. San Juan CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API