Cannon v. Oviatt
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CALLISTER, Chief Justice:
The appeals of the plaintiffs, which arose out of separate and unrelated actions, have been consolidated since they involved one common question of law, namely, was Section 41-9-1, U.C.A.1953, unconstitutional? Each plaintiff, while a guest in a motor vehicle, moving upon a public highway in this state, sustained personal injuries in a vehicular accident. Each plaintiff initiated an action against his host, the driver of the vehicle, to recover damages for the negligent operation of the vehicle. Each host asserted Section 41-9-1, U.C.A. 1953, as a defense and denied…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Brown v. MerloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Klein v. KleinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Manistee Bank & Trust Co. v. McGowanMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Malan v. LewisUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Thompson v. HaganIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
- Sidle v. MajorsIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
- Gray F. Madison, Sr., and Elizabeth B. Madison, Husband and Wife, Plaintiffs v. Deseret Livestock Company, a Utah CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.