May v. Georger
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by defendants from affirmance by the General Term of the City Oourt of a judgment in favor- of' plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.
The plaintiff bought a sealskin cloak from the defendants for $500 in November, 1892. As it was too large for her they offered to alter it any time free of charge.
In July following the plaintiff placed the garment on storage with the defendants, and later on went to have the alterations made. She requested the defendants to take it in at the waist and also bind it with sable around the bottom, and agreed to pay them $185, the price they asked for the work. They altered itandsent for her to try it on, and it was found to be too tight across the shoulders and back. The defendants promised to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Murray v. StantonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Austin v. . RawdonNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Mack v. . SnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Osterhout v. RobertsCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1827
- New York State Monitor Milk Pan Co. v. RemingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Joseph C. Baram v. Robert Farugia, Glenn S. Hackett and Dennis Fredella, Robert Farugia and Glenn S. HackettCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Nathan v. LockeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Furlan v. Rayan Photo Works, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1939
- Emmerich v. ChegnayAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905
- Gunther v. Morey Larue Laundry Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.