Legal Opinion
Furlan v. Rayan Photo Works, Inc.
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided June 9, 1939PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPette, J.
Plaintiff seeks to recover damages for injury to a rare photograph of his deceased mother alleged to have been damaged by the defendants who were intrusted with it for the purposes of reproduction.
The individual defendant is a pharmacist who took the order for the enlargement of the photograph by the corporate defendant. The photographic work was done for a stated consideration. When the original picture was returned, plaintiff claims that it had been stained, cracked and otherwise disfigured. By reason thereof, plaintiff claims that he was caused to suffer physical and mental anguish.
Ordinari…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jones v. . MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Boyce v. . Greeley Square Hotel Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Green v. Boston & Lowell RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- Barker v. Lewis Storage & Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
- Lake v. . DyeNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kennedy v. McKesson Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
- Jankoski v. Preiser Animal Hospital, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Mullen v. Sinclair Refining Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Higgins v. New York City Housing AuthorityCivil Court of the City of New York · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.