Legal Opinion

Kuniskas v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania State Police

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 10, 2009No. 2288 C.D. 2008PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

In this appeal, Andrew Kuniskas (Plaintiff) asks whether the Court of Common Pleas of the 44th Judicial District, Wyoming County Branch (trial court) erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the Pennsylvania State Police (PSP) in Plaintiffs negligence suit. The trial court determined Plaintiff, who suffered injuries as a result of a collision that occurred while he attempted to flee from a state police officer, could not sustain a cause of action against the PSP for his injuries because state police troopers do not owe a duty of care to fleeing drivers. See…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lindstrom v. City of CorrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Mullin v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Irish v. Lehigh County Housing AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Frazier v. COM. PA STATE, POLICECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Balshy v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Berwick Twp. v. R.F. O'BrienCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Sanchez-Guardiola v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Sellers v. Township of AbingtonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Mandakis v. Borough of MatamorasCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API