Legal Opinion
Cotten v. Heimbecher
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 17, 1932No. 3730PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaeb, C. J.
Appellee Heimbecher, a resident of Denver, Colo., sued T. W. Cotten, the firm of Black-ley & Christensen, and the Fidelity & Deposit Company, of Maryland, to recover damages in the sum of $1,878, as the alleged value of certain roofing tile which he claims he furnished the Bowman Construction Company, which company had contracted to construct a residence for Cotten in Amarillo, under a contract for the price of $17,000.
The plaintiff further alleges that, after commencing the construction of the building for Cotten, the Bowman Construction Company purchased certain tile from plaintiff, which…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ormsby v. RatcliffeTexas Supreme Court · 1928
- Thomas Lonergan v. San Antonio Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1907
- Moore v. HanscomTexas Supreme Court · 1908
- First National Bank v. Lyon-Gray Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1919
- Employers' Casualty Co. v. Rockwall CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McVea v. VerkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Baldwin v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936
- Hicks Rubber Co., Distributors v. StacyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Bodin v. Gulf Oil Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1988
- Dawson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.