Legal Opinion

Hicks Rubber Co., Distributors v. Stacy

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 1, 1939No. 8840PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAIR, Justice.

Appellant, Hicks Rubber Company, Distributors, a corporation, sued appellees, Harwood Stacy and D. C. Clarke, individually and as partners under the firm name of Louisville Development Company, for damages for conversion of an ornamental sign, for trespass upon the leased land upon which the sign was located, and for exemplary damages.

The undisputed facts showed that appellant owned a lease on a small portion of a 60-acre tract, was in possession of it, and had built a large ornamental advertising sign thereon. Afterwards, appellees purchased the 60-acre tract of land from…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Crawford v. ThomasonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  2. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Buckholts State BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. Texas Power Corp. v. KuehlerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  4. Kolp v. PrewittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Cotten v. HeimbecherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Charles F. Curry and Company v. HedrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  2. Holland v. LesesneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  3. McVea v. VerkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Kroger Food Company v. SingletaryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  5. Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API