Legal Opinion
Blumensaadt v. Standard Products Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided October 18, 1989No. 89CV7087PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WALINSKI, Senior District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on defendant, The Standard Products Company’s (“Standard”), motion for summary judgment and plaintiff, Virginia Blumensaadt’s, opposition thereto. Jurisdiction is based upon 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. For the following reasons defendant’s motion is well taken.
FACTS
Plaintiff began working for Standard as an hourly employee on June 16, 1975. The terms of plaintiff’s employment were governed by the union’s collective bargaining agreement in effect at that time.
On February 11, 1989 plaintiff’s employment was terminated…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Reddy v. Good Samaritan Hospital & Health CenterDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
- Garrett v. LujanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- Windover v. Sprague TechnologiesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1993
- Watson v. Ohio Dept. of Dev.Ohio Court of Claims · 2025