Legal Opinion
Amanto v. Witlin
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 29, 1982No. Civ. A. 81-4706PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GILES, District Judge.
Robert Amanto seeks injunctive relief as well as compensatory and punitive damages for alleged violation of his civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 1 He asserts that the defendants conspired to deprive him of due process during hearings held to determine his eligibility for disability benefits. Defendants are the Board of Pensions and Retirement of the City of Philadelphia, (the “Board”), the Board’s executive director, Anthony Witlin, and members of the medical panel employed by the Board. Jurisdiction is alleged to exist by virtue of 28 U.S.C. § 1331 as a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kugler v. HelfantSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Joseph v. Algemene Bank Nederland, NVDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Bonilla v. City of AllentownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Gniotek v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
- Kirk v. Allegheny Towing Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- BONILLA v. CITY OF ALLENTOWNDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.