Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Lear Seating Corp.

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided June 14, 2017No. 2:14-CV-374PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

RUDY LOZANO, United States District Judge

This matter is before the Court on the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Lear Seating Corporation (“Lear”) on May 5, 2016 (DE # 19), and Defendant’s Motion to Strike Inadmissible Hearsay Evidence filed by Lear on July 1, 2016 (DE # 29). For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (DE # 19) is GRANTED, and Defendant’s Motion to Strike (DE # 29) is GRANTED. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED with prejudice and the Clerk is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Tamika Wilson…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Goodman v. National Security Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  3. Karen Murphy v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  4. Gunville v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  5. O'LEARY v. Accretive Health, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Budimir v. Indiana Beach Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024
  2. Rutherford v. GladieuxDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024
  3. Solomon v. Wardlaw Claim Service, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API