Legal Opinion
Karen Murphy v. Carolyn Colvin
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 22, 2014No. 13-3154PublishedCited by 779 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
Karen Murphy claims that as a result of a stroke she has impairments so severe that she has not been able to return to her job as a secretary or work in another capacity. She applied for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”), but the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) denied her application finding that she was not disabled. The Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) also agreed with the SSA.
On appeal, Murphy argues the ALJ’s credibility determination was flawed because it was not supported by substantial evidence, and we agree. The ALJ erred by not…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Elder v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Craft v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Villano v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Terry Steele v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by779 opinions
- Michelle Jeske v. Andrew M. SaulCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Loveless v. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Donna Jarnutowski v. Kilolo KijakaziCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
- Margaret Cullinan v. Nancy BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- George Widmar v. Sun Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
774 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.