Legal Opinion

John S. Freund v. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 16, 1997No. 93-5317PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge:

This habeas corpus case provides a classic example of how a conflict of interest can prevent a law Arm from adequately representing a criminal defendant. The resolution of this case lies at the intersection of legal ethics and the constitutional protections afforded criminal defendants. The petitioner and another man faced murder charges in a Florida state court for a gruesome, drug-related killing. The State sought the death penalty. In light of the information gathered during the police investigation following the murder, the State did not have a strong case against…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. John S. Freund v. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. AdkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  3. Gary Lee Hess v. J.F. Mazurkiewicz, Supt. The Attorney General of the Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  4. Herring v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  5. United States v. EdwardsDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API