Legal Opinion

O & Y Landmark Associates of Virginia v. Nordheimer

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 16, 1989No. Civ. A. 89-2557PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

FLANNERY, District Judge.

In this matter, 0 & Y Landmark Associates of Virginia, a New York general partnership, petitions the court to compel three individuals to join an arbitration proceeding between petitioner and NF Associates, a District of Columbia general partnership. 1 The three respondents, Scott Nordheimer, Gary Nordheimer, and Myer Feldman, have guaranteed NF Associates’ performance of its obligations under a joint venture agreement with 0 & Y Landmark. 2 For their part, respondents have moved to dismiss the petition or to stay its consideration. For the reasons stated…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Application of Conticommodity Services Inc., for an Order Restraining Arbitration Attempted to Be Had by Philipp & LionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  5. Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S. A. v. Nereus Shipping, S. A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matter of Coastal Shipping and Southern PetroleumDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  2. Hargraves v. Capital City Mortgage Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API