Legal Opinion
Matter of Coastal Shipping and Southern Petroleum
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 1, 1993No. 92 CIV 3787 (SS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SOTOMAYOR, District Judge.
Petitioner Coastal Shipping Limited (“Coastal”) seeks an order compelling a consolidated arbitration of separate claims arising from two distinct bareboat charter agreements with respondent Southern Petroleum Tankers Limited (“Southern Petroleum”). Jurisdiction is premised on this Court’s general admiralty jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1333 (West 1992), and § 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act (the “Arbitration Act”), 9 U.S.C.A. §§ 1-14 (West 1991 & Supp.1992).
Southern Petroleum questions whether this Court has the authority under § 4 of the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mcallister Brothers, Inc. v. A & S Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Asplundh Tree Expert Company v. Robert E. BatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Champ v. Siegel Trading Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Champ v. Siegel Trading Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Active Glass Corp. v. Architectural & Ornamental Iron Workers Local Union 580District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Asoma Corp. v. M/V SEADANIELDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997