Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1998No. 21852PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHRUM, Judge.

Missouri’s Director of Revenue (Director) suspended Respondent’s driving privileges for driving with a blood alcohol concentration in excess of 0.10%. See § 302.505. 1 Respondent filed for a trial de novo on this issue as authorized by § 302.535, RSMo 1994. Ultimately, the court excluded Exhibit 1 (copies of records essential to Director’s case) because Director did not furnish Respondent all such documents seven days before trial as required by the business records statute, § 490.692, RSMo 1994. Accordingly, the court entered judgment directing the reinstatement of Respondent’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Hadlock v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. Kopp v. FranksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Hawk v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MO.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Mills v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hackmann v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Manzella v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Riggin v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Connelly v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. McDonough v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API