Coleman v. Director of Revenue
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SHRUM, Judge.
Missouri’s Director of Revenue (Director) suspended Respondent’s driving privileges for driving with a blood alcohol concentration in excess of 0.10%. See § 302.505. 1 Respondent filed for a trial de novo on this issue as authorized by § 302.535, RSMo 1994. Ultimately, the court excluded Exhibit 1 (copies of records essential to Director’s case) because Director did not furnish Respondent all such documents seven days before trial as required by the business records statute, § 490.692, RSMo 1994. Accordingly, the court entered judgment directing the reinstatement of Respondent’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Hadlock v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Kopp v. FranksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Hawk v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MO.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Mills v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hackmann v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Manzella v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Riggin v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Connelly v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- McDonough v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.