Kershner v. Kershner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, P. J.
The plaintiff seeks to annul a marriage contracted between the parties more than ten years prior to the commencement of this action. The alleged basis for said annulment is that *35the marriage was induced by false and fraudulent representations on the part of the defendant.
It is alleged that prior to the marriage- the plaintiff was engaged in the study of medicine with the intention of preparing himself to follow the profession of surgeon, involving a number pf years training and study after being licensed to practice as a physician, and that the defendant had full knowledge of that intention…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mirizio v. MirizioNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Attridge v. PembrokeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Glickman v. GlickmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Marriage of HiggasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Dworkin v. DworkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Cannon v. CannonNew York Family Court · 1947
- Persad v. BalramNew York Supreme Court · 2001
- Sheils v. SheilsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.