Legal Opinion

Kershner v. Kershner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1935PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, P. J.

The plaintiff seeks to annul a marriage contracted between the parties more than ten years prior to the commencement of this action. The alleged basis for said annulment is that *35the marriage was induced by false and fraudulent representations on the part of the defendant.

It is alleged that prior to the marriage- the plaintiff was engaged in the study of medicine with the intention of preparing himself to follow the profession of surgeon, involving a number pf years training and study after being licensed to practice as a physician, and that the defendant had full knowledge of that intention…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mirizio v. MirizioNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Attridge v. PembrokeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  3. Glickman v. GlickmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of HiggasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Dworkin v. DworkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  3. Cannon v. CannonNew York Family Court · 1947
  4. Persad v. BalramNew York Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Sheils v. SheilsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API