Legal Opinion
People v. Sadacca
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 16, 1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold J. Rothwax, J.
The defendant herein has been charged in two counts with peijury in the first degree (Penal Law § 210.15) and in one count with tampering with a witness in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 215.10 [b]). The theory of the peijury prosecution is unusual, in that the defendant was neither a witness in the proceeding in which the peijury was allegedly committed nor a party to an agreement with the witness to commit the alleged peijury; rather the defendant is alleged to have deceived the witness into testifying to material facts which the defendant knew to be…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. CableNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. KibbeNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. La BelleNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Hammer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- People v. PapernoNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. EnfeldNew York Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. HalloranNew York Supreme Court · 1986