Legal Opinion
People v. Halloran
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 11, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Carol Berkman, J.
The defendants, indicted for the crimes of scheme to defraud in the second degree by means of false and fraudulent pretenses and representations (Penal Law § 190.60) and two counts of grand larceny in the second degree (Penal Law § 155.35) have moved for inspection of the Grand Jury minutes and dismissal of the indictment. The People have consented to an in camera review of the minutes by the court.
The grand larceny counts, properly, do not specify the manner of the unlawful taking (Penal Law § 155.45). The scheme to defraud count, however, recites that by…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- People v. Calbud, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. SpannNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. AlamoNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Heuertematte v. . MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Matter of Extradition of CheungDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
- People v. MaddenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987