Legal Opinion

City of Nashville v. Lawrence

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1925PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

The purpose of this suit is to determine the ownership of the fee in a street which the city of Nashville proposes to abandon.

In 1880, the defendants’ ancestor, John M. Lawrence, owned a lot containing about one acre of land located on the north side of Broad street, and having a depth of about two hundred eleven feet.

This lot was bounded on the west by the property of the N. & C. Railway.

Walnut street extended south from Church street to about the center of the Lawrence propery. Lawrence thereupon dedicated a thirty-five-foot street through his lot to the city, thus extending Walnut street…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Marks v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  2. Hamilton County v. RapeTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Railroad v. BinghamTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Potter v. BoyceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  5. Campbell v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & R.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Texas Bitulithic Co. v. WarwickTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  2. Brummitt Tire Co. v. Sinclair Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934
  3. City Motel, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. State Department of HighwaysNevada Supreme Court · 1959
  4. First American National Bank v. Chicken System of America, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1974
  5. City of Covington v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API