Legal Opinion

Kenneth Snell v. City of Murfreesboro

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided August 27, 2004No. M2003-02716-COA-R3-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE On-Brief June 24, 2004 KENNETH SNELL, ET AL. v. CITY OF MURFREESBORO A Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County No. 47874 The Honorable Robert E. Corlew, Judge No. M2003-02716-COA-R3-CV - Filed August 27, 2004 Plaintiffs appeal from trial court’s dismissal of complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Plaintiffs allege that trial court erred in finding that Plaintiffs had no standing to challenge annexation ordinance passed by City of Murfreesboro. Finding that the trial court was correct in determining that Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Riggs v. BursonTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Cook v. Spinnaker's of Rivergate, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Cornpropst v. SloanTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Wolcotts Financial Services, Inc. v. McReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  5. State Ex Rel. Earhart v. City of BristolTennessee Supreme Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API