Legal Opinion

Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Willingham

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 1940No. 6 Div. 485PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Rehearing.

Upon the submission here of this case, and after; hawing heard and considered the oral argument of counsel, and after having also read and attentively considered briefs and arguments filed by each of the respective parties, and after having given thoughtful, extended and careful consideration to all of the testimony set out in the record, this court did ascertain and determine, as a matter of fact, that there was a conflict between the testimony offered by the plaintiff, in the court below, and that offered by the defendant, upon the trial of this case, as to whether or not the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. MinderhoutSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Cooper v. AgeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Mobile Pure Milk Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Byars v. Town of BoazSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Automotive Acceptance Corporation v. PowellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970
  2. Birmingham Electric Co. v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  3. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. WillinghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  4. Brooks v. Crimson Homes, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  5. Birmingham Electric Co. v. BaileyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API