Legal Opinion

Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Willingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 8, 1942No. 6 Div. 907PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVINGSTON, Justice.

The cause of action arose out of a collision between appellant’s locomotive engine and two cars, commonly known as “hot-pots”, and an automobile truck belonging to Fred W. Peinhardt, which was being driven at the time and place of the collision by appellee, A. O. Willingham, the agent, servant or employee of Peinhardt.

Appellee and Peinhardt filed separate suits against appellant. On motion of appellant, the two suits were consolidated and tried jointly under and by virtue of the provisions of section 221, Title 7, Code of 1940, and resulted in a judgment for Peinhardt for…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance v. HillmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. DrennenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Montgomery & Eufaula Railway Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  5. Bibb v. ReidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Mobile City Lines, Inc. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  2. Ridgeway v. CSX Transp., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Howard WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  4. Callaway v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  5. Herrington v. HudsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API