Legal Opinion

Government of the Virgin Islands ex rel. C.C. v. A.P.

Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands

Decided December 13, 1995No. Fam. No. S160/1994PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This matter presents an issue of first impression in this jurisdiction. The issue presented is whether a putative father who acknowledged paternity is barred by the doctrines of collateral estoppel, res judicata, or equitable estoppel contesting the paternity determination, even when blood testing establishes that the putative father is not the child's biological father. For the reasons stated herein, this Court finds that respondent is barred by the doctrines of collateral estoppel and res judicata from contesting the paternity determination.

FACTS

Due to the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States of America Ex Rel. Harry E. Carey v. A. T. Rundle, Supt.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  2. United States v. Yu KikumuraCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  3. Wachter v. AsceroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Shindel v. LeedomSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Simcox v. SimcoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Adams-TuteinDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API