United States v. Yu Kikumura
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
COWEN, Circuit Judge.
The principal question presented by this appeal is whether the failure of the district court to grant defendant Yu Kikumura a continuance until the attorney of his choice could be present at his resentencing proceeding constituted a denial of his right to counsel in violation of the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. In addition, Kikumura argues that the district court violated his due process rights by taking into consideration his intent to kill in the absence of a conviction for attempted murder when it resentenced him for his conviction…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- Laborers' International Union of North America, Afl-Cio, in No. 93-5208 v. Foster Wheeler Corporation Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation. Laborers' International Union of North America, Afl-Cio v. Foster Wheeler Corporation Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation in No. 93-5233. Laborers' International Union of North America, Afl-Cio v. Foster Wheeler Corporation Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Foster Wheeler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. James F. MooredCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Tollett v. The City of KemahCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. George Robert BellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Richard Harmon BellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.