In re Thompson
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
JiPER CURIAM.*
This attorney disciplinary proceeding arises from the fifing of one count of formal charges by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Kevin David Thompson, an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Louisiana, for allowing his client’s claim to prescribe and becoming involved in a conflict of interest by attempting to monetarily settle his liability with his client, in violation of Rules 1.3 (lack of due diligence); Rule 1.4 (failure to communicate with a client); 1.7(b)(representing a client with a present conflict of interest);…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cited by9 opinions
- Carl Selenberg v. Dianne BatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- In re DunnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
- In re HeislerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
- In re PetalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
- In re SpearsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.