Patrick v. WIX AUTO CO., INC.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cerda
Plaintiff, Catherine Patrick, filed a class action against defendant, Wix Auto Company, alleging that defendant failed to comply with the satisfaction-by-repossession notice requirements of section 9 — 505(2) of the Illinois Uniform Commercial Code (810 ILCS 5/9— 505(2) (West 1994)) after it repossessed her automobile. Defendant filed a section 2 — 615 motion to dismiss the complaint (735 ILCS 5/2 — 615 (West 1994)), which was granted. The trial court found that the notice sent by defendant was sufficient as a matter of law. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand.
Plaintiff purchased…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kolegas v. Heftel Broadcasting Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Fellhauer v. City of GenevaIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Mt. Zion State Bank & Trust v. Consolidated Communications, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1995
- Urbaitis v. Commonwealth EdisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
- F.H. Prince & Co. v. Towers Financial Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Munao v. LagattutaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Whitaker v. Wedbush Securities, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2020
- Whitaker v. Wedbush Securities, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2021
- Chamorro Equities, Inc. v. McCurdySuperior Court of Guam · 2014
- Munao v. LagattutaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.