Legal Opinion

Patrick v. WIX AUTO CO., INC.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 5, 1997No. 1-96-0609PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cerda

Plaintiff, Catherine Patrick, filed a class action against defendant, Wix Auto Company, alleging that defendant failed to comply with the satisfaction-by-repossession notice requirements of section 9 — 505(2) of the Illinois Uniform Commercial Code (810 ILCS 5/9— 505(2) (West 1994)) after it repossessed her automobile. Defendant filed a section 2 — 615 motion to dismiss the complaint (735 ILCS 5/2 — 615 (West 1994)), which was granted. The trial court found that the notice sent by defendant was sufficient as a matter of law. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand.

Plaintiff purchased…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kolegas v. Heftel Broadcasting Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Fellhauer v. City of GenevaIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Mt. Zion State Bank & Trust v. Consolidated Communications, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Urbaitis v. Commonwealth EdisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  5. F.H. Prince & Co. v. Towers Financial Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Munao v. LagattutaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  2. Whitaker v. Wedbush Securities, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Whitaker v. Wedbush Securities, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Chamorro Equities, Inc. v. McCurdySuperior Court of Guam · 2014
  5. Munao v. LagattutaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API