Legal Opinion

Munao v. Lagattuta

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 18, 1998No. 1-96-1990PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cahill

After defendants defaulted on a note and lease, plaintiffs, Michael and Charlene Munao, sued to recover the balance owed on the note and lease. After a bench trial, the trial court ruled for plaintiffs on a deficiency claim and against defendants, Nicholas Lagattuta, Dennis J. Lullo, and Lullo Food Service Company, on their counterclaim for surplus received by plaintiffs from retention of the security. The trial court found that defendants were entitled to a credit on the note in the amount of $9,067.07. The trial court entered judgment for plaintiffs in the amount of $83,483.38 on the note…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Nelson v. ArmstrongIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Jones v. MorganMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. S. M. Flickinger Co. v. 18 Genesee Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  4. Russell v. Jim Russell Supply, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  5. First Galesburg National Bank & Trust Co. v. JoannidesIllinois Supreme Court · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fodale v. Waste Management of Michigan, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Merrill Lynch Business Financial Services, Inc. v. NudellDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2003
  3. AAR Aircraft & Engine Group, Inc. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  4. Notinger v. Auto Shine Car Wash Systems, Inc. (In Re Campano)District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2003
  5. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB v. HerzogAppellate Court of Illinois · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API