Legal Opinion

Krusi v. S.J. Amoroso Construction Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 18, 2000No. A086602PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HAERLE, Acting P. J.

I. Introduction

In 1995, two testamentary trusts (hereinafter appellants), purchased a two-story commercial building. The following year, they filed suit against respondents, the architects and contractors who designed and constructed the building in 1985-1987, alleging improper design and/or construction. The trial court granted respondents summary judgment on the basis that appellants, the fourth owners of the building, lacked standing to sue. We affirm.

n. Factual and Procedural Background

The building at issue in this case is located at 3351 El Camino Real in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. J'Aire Corp. v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Parsons v. Crown Disposal Co.California Supreme Court · 1997
  4. CAMSI IV v. Hunter Technology Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. San Francisco Unified School District v. W.R. Grace & Company-ConnecticutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Aas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Fluor Corporation v. Super. Ct.California Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Keilholtz v. Lennox Hearth Products Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
  4. Jasmine Networks, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Standard Fire Ins. v. Spectrum Community Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API