Legal Opinion

Wiley v. Lovely

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1881PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Livingston.. Assumpsit for breach of covenant. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

Wiley, as assignee of the right of action, sued for an alleged breach of the covenant of seizin contained in a deed given by Lovely to one Charles M. Sheldon September 4,1877.

The cause was tried without a jury and the circuit judge-found- for the defendant. The deed set forth the property as being “ all that certain piece or parcel of land lying and being in the village of Fowlerville, county of Livingston and State of Michigan, and more particularly known and described as follows, to-wit: village lot number seventy-seven (77) of the original plat of the village of Eowlerville, as duly laid…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jackson ex dem. Rogers v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1810
  2. Johnstone v. ScottMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Slater v. BreeseMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Goodenow v. CurtisMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Jones v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1878

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sengfelder v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Schweiss v. WoodruffMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Sherwood v. WhitingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1887
  4. Pere Marquette Railroad v. GrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Thrasher v. RoysterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API