Legal Opinion

Pere Marquette Railroad v. Graham

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1907No. Docket No. 40PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Berrien; Coolidge, J. Ejectment by the Pere Marquette Railroad Company against Edmond A. Graham and others. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

This is an action of ejectmentfor the south two-thirds of lot number 451 in the city of St. Joseph. On the first trial the court directed a verdict for the de*220fendants. That judgment was brought to this court and reversed. 136 Mich. 444.

Two questions were settled upon substantially the same record, which need not now be considered. It was there held that the foreclosure proceedings and the deed based thereon covered after-acquired property, including that in dispute. It was also held that there were two disputed questions of fact, namely: Was the land in dispute a part of the south two-thirds…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Quinnin v. ReimersMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Johnstone v. ScottMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Hoffman v. City of Port HuronMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Twogood v. HoytMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Van Den Brooks v. CorreonMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lester v. SchuttSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  2. Miller v. MichelMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Roane County Bank v. PhillipsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Werner v. HinzMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API