Legal Opinion

Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Martin

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 29, 1961No. 18579_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

298 F.2d 163

HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY, Appellant,

v.

Mabel W. MARTIN, Annie M. Kelly, Sue Kelly Mee, W. J. Vollor, Landman Teller, James P. Biedenharn, L. C. Gwin and R. D. Kuehnle, Appellees.

No. 18579.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

December 29, 1961.

M. M. Roberts, Joe A. Thompson, W. H. Morrow, Hattiesburg, Miss., for appellant.

Landman Teller, of Teller, Biedenharn & Rogers, Vicksburg, Miss., L. C. Gwin, of Gwin & Kuehnle, Natchez, Miss., for appellees.

Before CAMERON and WISDOM, Circuit Judges, and THOMAS, District Judge.

CAMERON, Circuit Judge.

1

Appellees Mabel W. Martin, et…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Calcote v. Texas Pac. Coal & Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
  2. Hudson v. NewellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
  3. Keegan v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
  4. Lige Estes v. Shell Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  5. Seeley v. CornellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. TXG Intrastate Pipeline Co. v. GrossnickleMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Henry G. Mills, Plaintiffs/counter v. Damson Oil Corp., Defendant/counterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API